Jura 30 Year Old vs Laphroaig 23 Year Old 1989 Vintage
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Jura 30 Year Old | Laphroaig 23 Year Old 1989 Vintage | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | Laphroaig |
| Region | Island | — |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 44% | 48.9% |
| Age | 30 yr | 23 yr |
| Price | £699 | £999 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Jura 30 Year Old
Laphroaig 23 Year Old 1989 Vintage
Jura 30 Year Old
Laphroaig 23 Year Old 1989 Vintage
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £999.
For beginners: Jura 30 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£699 vs £999)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 23 years)
Cons
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Laphroaig 23 Year Old 1989 Vintage
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −More expensive (£999 vs £699)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
- −Dry and austere — not for those who prefer sweeter drams
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy Laphroaig?
Laphroaig 23 Year Old 1989 Vintage suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Tasting notes
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only Laphroaig 23 Year Old 1989 Vintage