Big Peat 33 Year Old vs James Martin's 20 Year Old
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Big Peat 33 Year Old | James Martin's 20 Year Old | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Big Peat | James Martin |
| Region | Islay | — |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Blended Malt | Blended |
| ABV | 47.2% | 43% |
| Age | 33 yr | 20 yr |
| Price | £249.95 | £199 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Big Peat 33 Year Old
James Martin's 20 Year Old
Big Peat 33 Year Old
James Martin's 20 Year Old
Quick verdict
Big Peat 33 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
James Martin's 20 Year Old is better value at £199 vs £250.
For beginners: James Martin's 20 Year Old is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
Big Peat 33 Year Old
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +Longer maturation (33 vs 20 years)
Cons
- −More expensive (£249.95 vs £199)
James Martin's 20 Year Old
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +More affordable (£199 vs £249.95)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Who should buy Big?
Big Peat 33 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Islay character.
Who should buy James?
James Martin's 20 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Blended character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Big Peat 33 Year Old
Only James Martin's 20 Year Old