James Martin's 20 Year Old vs Big Peat 33 Year Old
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| James Martin's 20 Year Old | Big Peat 33 Year Old | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | James Martin | Big Peat |
| Region | — | Islay |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Blended | Blended Malt |
| ABV | 43% | 47.2% |
| Age | 20 yr | 33 yr |
| Price | £199 | £249.95 |
| Rating | — | 5.00/5 |
James Martin's 20 Year Old
Big Peat 33 Year Old
James Martin's 20 Year Old
Big Peat 33 Year Old
Quick verdict
Big Peat 33 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
James Martin's 20 Year Old is better value at £199 vs £250.
For beginners: James Martin's 20 Year Old is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
James Martin's 20 Year Old
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +More affordable (£199 vs £249.95)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Big Peat 33 Year Old
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +Longer maturation (33 vs 20 years)
Cons
- −More expensive (£249.95 vs £199)
Who should buy James?
James Martin's 20 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Blended character.
Who should buy Big?
Big Peat 33 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Islay character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only James Martin's 20 Year Old
Only Big Peat 33 Year Old