Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release) vs Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release)
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release)
Laphroaig
★ 5.00
£1500
Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release)
Springbank
£1295
| Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release) | Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release) | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Laphroaig | Springbank |
| Region | Islay | — |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 46.6% | 46% |
| Age | 32 yr | 32 yr |
| Price | £1500 | £1295 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release)
Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release)
Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release)
Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release)
Quick verdict
Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release) is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release) is better value at £1295 vs £1500.
For beginners: Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release) is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release)
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −More expensive (£1500 vs £1295)
Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release)
Pros
- +More affordable (£1295 vs £1500)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Who should buy Laphroaig?
Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release) suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Islay character.
Who should buy Springbank?
Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release) suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Laphroaig 32 Year Old (2015 Release)
Only Springbank 32 Year Old (2004 Release)