Jura 30 Year Old vs Yamazaki Puncheon 2013
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Jura 30 Year Old | Yamazaki Puncheon 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | Yamazaki |
| Region | Island | — |
| Country | Scotland | Japan |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 44% | 48% |
| Age | 30 yr | NAS |
| Price | £699 | £899 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Jura 30 Year Old
Yamazaki Puncheon 2013
Jura 30 Year Old
Yamazaki Puncheon 2013
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £899.
For beginners: Jura 30 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +More affordable (£699 vs £899)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Yamazaki Puncheon 2013
Pros
- +Distinctive flavour profile appreciated by enthusiasts
Cons
- −More expensive (£899 vs £699)
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy Yamazaki?
Yamazaki Puncheon 2013 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only Yamazaki Puncheon 2013