Jura 30 Year Old vs Sullivans Cove 17 Year Old American Oak
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Jura 30 Year Old | Sullivans Cove 17 Year Old American Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | Tasmania Distillery |
| Region | Island | — |
| Country | Scotland | Australia |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 44% | 47.5% |
| Age | 30 yr | 17 yr |
| Price | £699 | £995 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 1.00/5 |
Jura 30 Year Old
Sullivans Cove 17 Year Old American Oak
Jura 30 Year Old
Sullivans Cove 17 Year Old American Oak
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 1.00).
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £995.
For beginners: Jura 30 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£699 vs £995)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 17 years)
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Sullivans Cove 17 Year Old American Oak
Pros
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −More expensive (£995 vs £699)
- −Lower community rating (1.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy Sullivans?
Sullivans Cove 17 Year Old American Oak suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only Sullivans Cove 17 Year Old American Oak