Jura 30 Year Old vs St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Jura 30 Year Old
Jura
★ 5.00
£699
St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky
St Magdalene
£1000
| Jura 30 Year Old | St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | St Magdalene |
| Region | Island | — |
| Country | Scotland | United Kingdom |
| Type | Single Malt | |
| ABV | 44% | 40% |
| Age | 30 yr | NAS |
| Price | £699 | £1000 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Jura 30 Year Old
St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky
Jura 30 Year Old
St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £1000.
For beginners: St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky is more approachable (65/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£699 vs £1000)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky
Pros
- +Distinctive flavour profile appreciated by enthusiasts
Cons
- −More expensive (£1000 vs £699)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy St.?
St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only St. Magdalene 1982 / 28 Year Old / Old Malt Cask #7093 Lowland Whisky