Jura 30 Year Old vs Port Ellen 16 Year Old 1980 (cask 89/589/47) - First Cask
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Jura 30 Year Old
Jura
★ 5.00
£699
Port Ellen 16 Year Old 1980 (cask 89/589/47) - First Cask
Port Ellen
£995
| Jura 30 Year Old | Port Ellen 16 Year Old 1980 (cask 89/589/47) - First Cask | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | Port Ellen |
| Region | Island | — |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 44% | 46% |
| Age | 30 yr | 16 yr |
| Price | £699 | £995 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Jura 30 Year Old
Port Ellen 16 Year Old 1980 (cask 89/589/47) - First Cask
Jura 30 Year Old
Port Ellen 16 Year Old 1980 (cask 89/589/47) - First Cask
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £995.
For beginners: Jura 30 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£699 vs £995)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 16 years)
Cons
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Port Ellen 16 Year Old 1980 (cask 89/589/47) - First Cask
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −More expensive (£995 vs £699)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
- −Dry and austere — not for those who prefer sweeter drams
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy Port?
Port Ellen 16 Year Old 1980 (cask 89/589/47) - First Cask suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only Port Ellen 16 Year Old 1980 (cask 89/589/47) - First Cask