Jura 30 Year Old vs Miltonduff 40 Year Old 1982 (cask 3726) - (Adelphi)
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Jura 30 Year Old | Miltonduff 40 Year Old 1982 (cask 3726) - (Adelphi) | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | Miltonduff |
| Region | Island | Speyside |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 44% | 50.4% |
| Age | 30 yr | 40 yr |
| Price | £699 | £730 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Jura 30 Year Old
Miltonduff 40 Year Old 1982 (cask 3726) - (Adelphi)
Jura 30 Year Old
Miltonduff 40 Year Old 1982 (cask 3726) - (Adelphi)
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £730.
For beginners: Jura 30 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£699 vs £730)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Miltonduff 40 Year Old 1982 (cask 3726) - (Adelphi)
Pros
- +Longer maturation (40 vs 30 years)
Cons
- −High ABV (50.4%) — may need water
- −More expensive (£730 vs £699)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy Miltonduff?
Miltonduff 40 Year Old 1982 (cask 3726) - (Adelphi) is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only Miltonduff 40 Year Old 1982 (cask 3726) - (Adelphi)