Jura 30 Year Old vs Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Jura 30 Year Old
Jura
★ 5.00
£699
Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum
Laurent-Perrier
£765
| Jura 30 Year Old | Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | Laurent-Perrier |
| Region | Island | — |
| Country | Scotland | United Kingdom |
| Type | Single Malt | |
| ABV | 44% | 40% |
| Age | 30 yr | NAS |
| Price | £699 | £765 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Jura 30 Year Old
Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum
Jura 30 Year Old
Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £765.
For beginners: Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£699 vs £765)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −More expensive (£765 vs £699)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy Laurent-Perrier?
Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only Laurent-Perrier Alexandra Rose 2012 Champagne / Magnum