Jura 30 Year Old vs Lagavulin 22 Year Old 2000 - My Name is Whisky
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Jura 30 Year Old | Lagavulin 22 Year Old 2000 - My Name is Whisky | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | Lagavulin |
| Region | Island | Islay |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 44% | 52% |
| Age | 30 yr | 22 yr |
| Price | £699 | £1100 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Jura 30 Year Old
Lagavulin 22 Year Old 2000 - My Name is Whisky
Jura 30 Year Old
Lagavulin 22 Year Old 2000 - My Name is Whisky
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £1100.
For beginners: Jura 30 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£699 vs £1100)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 22 years)
Cons
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Lagavulin 22 Year Old 2000 - My Name is Whisky
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
Cons
- −High ABV (52%) — may need water
- −More expensive (£1100 vs £699)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy Lagavulin?
Lagavulin 22 Year Old 2000 - My Name is Whisky is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Tasting notes
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only Lagavulin 22 Year Old 2000 - My Name is Whisky