Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s vs Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1)
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s
Loch Lomond
★ 5.00
£100
Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1)
Kininvie
★ 5.00
£120
| Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s | Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Loch Lomond | Kininvie |
| Region | Highland | Speyside |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 46% | 42.6% |
| Age | 15 yr | 17 yr |
| Price | £99.95 | £120 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s
Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1)
Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s
Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1)
Quick verdict
Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s is better value at £100 vs £120.
For beginners: Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1) is more approachable (85/100 beginner score).
Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +More affordable (£99.95 vs £120)
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1)
Pros
- +Approachable and beginner-friendly sweetness
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +Longer maturation (17 vs 15 years)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −More expensive (£120 vs £99.95)
Who should buy Inchmurrin?
Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Who should buy Kininvie?
Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1) is an ideal first whisky — sweet, approachable, and widely available. It's a great gift and a safe choice for anyone new to whisky or who prefers lighter, friendlier drams.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Inchmurrin 15 Year Old - 2010s
Only Kininvie 17 Year Old 1996 (Batch 1)