Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old vs Yula 22 Year Old (Douglas Laing)
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old
Samuel Gulliver & Co
★ 5.00
£93
Yula 22 Year Old (Douglas Laing)
Douglas Laing
£118
| Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old | Yula 22 Year Old (Douglas Laing) | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Samuel Gulliver & Co | Douglas Laing |
| Region | — | — |
| Country | England | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Blended Malt |
| ABV | 47% | 51.2% |
| Age | 10 yr | 22 yr |
| Price | £92.95 | £118.43 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old
Yula 22 Year Old (Douglas Laing)
Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old
Yula 22 Year Old (Douglas Laing)
Quick verdict
Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old is better value at £93 vs £118.
For beginners: Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old is more approachable (50/100 beginner score).
Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£92.95 vs £118.43)
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Yula 22 Year Old (Douglas Laing)
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Longer maturation (22 vs 10 years)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −High ABV (51.2%) — may need water
- −More expensive (£118.43 vs £92.95)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Gulliver’s?
Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Who should buy Yula?
Yula 22 Year Old (Douglas Laing) is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Gulliver’s 47 10 Year Old
Only Yula 22 Year Old (Douglas Laing)