Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820) vs Shirakawa 1958
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820) | Shirakawa 1958 | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Glenfarclas | Takara Shuzo |
| Region | Speyside | — |
| Country | Scotland | Japan |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 40.9% | 49% |
| Age | 60 yr | NAS |
| Price | £19500 | £23495 |
| Rating | — | 5.00/5 |
Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820)
Shirakawa 1958
Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820)
Shirakawa 1958
Quick verdict
Shirakawa 1958 is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820) is better value at £19500 vs £23495.
For beginners: Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820) is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820)
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +More affordable (£19500 vs £23495)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Shirakawa 1958
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −More expensive (£23495 vs £19500)
Who should buy Glenfarclas?
Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820) suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Speyside character.
Who should buy Shirakawa?
Shirakawa 1958 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Glenfarclas 60 Year Old (cask 1820)
Only Shirakawa 1958