Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing) vs Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Glen Mhor
★ 5.00
£124
Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Tullibardine
★ 5.00
£155
| Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing) | Tullibardine 25 Year Old | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Glen Mhor | Tullibardine |
| Region | Highland | Highland |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 50% | 43% |
| Age | 30 yr | 25 yr |
| Price | £123.6 | £155 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Quick verdict
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing) is better value at £124 vs £155.
For beginners: Tullibardine 25 Year Old is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +More affordable (£123.6 vs £155)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 25 years)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −More expensive (£155 vs £123.6)
Who should buy Glen?
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing) suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Who should buy Tullibardine?
Tullibardine 25 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Only Tullibardine 25 Year Old