Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968 vs Yamazaki 50 Year Old
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968 | Yamazaki 50 Year Old | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Bunnahabhain | Yamazaki |
| Region | Islay | — |
| Country | Scotland | Japan |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 41.8% | 57% |
| Age | 46 yr | 50 yr |
| Price | £13000 | £9999.95 |
| Rating | — | 4.56/5 |
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Yamazaki 50 Year Old
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Yamazaki 50 Year Old
Quick verdict
Yamazaki 50 Year Old is rated higher (4.56 vs 0.00).
Yamazaki 50 Year Old is better value at £10000 vs £13000.
For beginners: Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968 is more approachable (55/100 beginner score).
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
Cons
- −More expensive (£13000 vs £9999.95)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 4.6)
- −Dry and austere — not for those who prefer sweeter drams
Yamazaki 50 Year Old
Pros
- +Higher community rating (4.6/5)
- +More affordable (£9999.95 vs £13000)
- +Longer maturation (50 vs 46 years)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −High ABV (57%) — may need water
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Who should buy Bunnahabhain?
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Islay character.
Who should buy Yamazaki?
Yamazaki 50 Year Old is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Only Yamazaki 50 Year Old