Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968 vs Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Bunnahabhain
£13000
Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter
Glenfarclas
★ 4.83
£9883
| Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968 | Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Bunnahabhain | Glenfarclas |
| Region | Islay | Speyside |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 41.8% | 40.6% |
| Age | 46 yr | 50 yr |
| Price | £13000 | £9882.5 |
| Rating | — | 4.83/5 |
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter
Quick verdict
Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter is rated higher (4.83 vs 0.00).
Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter is better value at £9883 vs £13000.
For beginners: Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
Cons
- −More expensive (£13000 vs £9882.5)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 4.8)
- −Dry and austere — not for those who prefer sweeter drams
Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +Higher community rating (4.8/5)
- +More affordable (£9882.5 vs £13000)
- +Longer maturation (50 vs 46 years)
Cons
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Who should buy Bunnahabhain?
Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Islay character.
Who should buy Glenfarclas?
Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Speyside character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Bunnahabhain 46 Year Old 1968
Only Glenfarclas 50 Year Old Decanter