Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) vs Michel Couvreur Fleeting 13 Year Old 2012
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Balblair
★ 5.00
£68
Michel Couvreur Fleeting 13 Year Old 2012
Michel Couvreur
£113
| Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) | Michel Couvreur Fleeting 13 Year Old 2012 | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Balblair | Michel Couvreur |
| Region | Highland | — |
| Country | Scotland | France |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 46% | 49% |
| Age | 17 yr | 13 yr |
| Price | £68.12 | £113.46 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Michel Couvreur Fleeting 13 Year Old 2012
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Michel Couvreur Fleeting 13 Year Old 2012
Quick verdict
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) is better value at £68 vs £113.
For beginners: Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) is more approachable (80/100 beginner score).
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Pros
- +Approachable and beginner-friendly sweetness
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Michel Couvreur Fleeting 13 Year Old 2012
Pros
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −More expensive (£113.46 vs £68.12)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Balblair?
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) is an ideal first whisky — sweet, approachable, and widely available. It's a great gift and a safe choice for anyone new to whisky or who prefers lighter, friendlier drams.
Who should buy Michel?
Michel Couvreur Fleeting 13 Year Old 2012 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Only Michel Couvreur Fleeting 13 Year Old 2012