Jura 30 Year Old vs Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Jura 30 Year Old
Jura
★ 5.00
£699
Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection
Glen Elgin
£699
| Jura 30 Year Old | Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Jura | Glen Elgin |
| Region | Island | Speyside |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 44% | 50.1% |
| Age | 30 yr | 22 yr |
| Price | £699 | £699 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Jura 30 Year Old
Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection
Jura 30 Year Old
Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection is better value at £699 vs £699.
For beginners: Jura 30 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 22 years)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection
Pros
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −High ABV (50.1%) — may need water
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Who should buy Glen?
Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Jura 30 Year Old
Only Glen Elgin-Glenlivet 22 Year Old 1971 - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection