Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 vs Springbank 12 Year Old Cask Strength - Batch 15 (2017 Release)
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Ardmore
★ 5.00
£250
Springbank 12 Year Old Cask Strength - Batch 15 (2017 Release)
Springbank
★ 5.00
£299
| Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 | Springbank 12 Year Old Cask Strength - Batch 15 (2017 Release) | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Ardmore | Springbank |
| Region | Highland | Campbeltown |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 47.2% | 56.5% |
| Age | 30 yr | 12 yr |
| Price | £250 | £299 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Springbank 12 Year Old Cask Strength - Batch 15 (2017 Release)
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Springbank 12 Year Old Cask Strength - Batch 15 (2017 Release)
Quick verdict
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 is better value at £250 vs £299.
For beginners: Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 is more approachable (55/100 beginner score).
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +More affordable (£250 vs £299)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 12 years)
Cons
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Springbank 12 Year Old Cask Strength - Batch 15 (2017 Release)
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Approachable and beginner-friendly sweetness
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −High ABV (56.5%) — may need water
- −More expensive (£299 vs £250)
Who should buy Ardmore?
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Who should buy Springbank?
Springbank 12 Year Old Cask Strength - Batch 15 (2017 Release) suits those who enjoy sweet, honeyed, or fruity whiskies. It's accessible for beginners and crowd-pleasing enough for gifts. Fans of approachable Speyside or Irish whiskey will love it.
Tasting notes
Only Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Only Springbank 12 Year Old Cask Strength - Batch 15 (2017 Release)