Ardmore 17 Year Old 2002 (cask 317) (Adelphi) vs Longmorn 15 Year Old
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Ardmore 17 Year Old 2002 (cask 317) (Adelphi) | Longmorn 15 Year Old | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Ardmore | Longmorn |
| Region | Highland | Speyside |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 58.2% | 45% |
| Age | 17 yr | 15 yr |
| Price | £129.88 | £150 |
| Rating | — | 5.00/5 |
Ardmore 17 Year Old 2002 (cask 317) (Adelphi)
Longmorn 15 Year Old
Ardmore 17 Year Old 2002 (cask 317) (Adelphi)
Longmorn 15 Year Old
Quick verdict
Longmorn 15 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Ardmore 17 Year Old 2002 (cask 317) (Adelphi) is better value at £130 vs £150.
For beginners: Longmorn 15 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Ardmore 17 Year Old 2002 (cask 317) (Adelphi)
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +More affordable (£129.88 vs £150)
- +Longer maturation (17 vs 15 years)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −High ABV (58.2%) — may need water
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Longmorn 15 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −More expensive (£150 vs £129.88)
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Who should buy Ardmore?
Ardmore 17 Year Old 2002 (cask 317) (Adelphi) is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Who should buy Longmorn?
Longmorn 15 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Speyside character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Ardmore 17 Year Old 2002 (cask 317) (Adelphi)
Only Longmorn 15 Year Old