Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 vs Teaninich 23 Year Old 1972 - Rare Malts
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 | Teaninich 23 Year Old 1972 - Rare Malts | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Ardmore | Teaninich |
| Region | Highland | Highland |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 47.2% | 65% |
| Age | 30 yr | 23 yr |
| Price | £250 | £344.14 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Teaninich 23 Year Old 1972 - Rare Malts
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Teaninich 23 Year Old 1972 - Rare Malts
Quick verdict
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 is better value at £250 vs £344.
For beginners: Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 is more approachable (55/100 beginner score).
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +More affordable (£250 vs £344.14)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 23 years)
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Teaninich 23 Year Old 1972 - Rare Malts
Pros
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −High ABV (65%) — may need water
- −More expensive (£344.14 vs £250)
Who should buy Ardmore?
Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Who should buy Teaninich?
Teaninich 23 Year Old 1972 - Rare Malts is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Tasting notes
Only Ardmore 30 Year Old 1987
Only Teaninich 23 Year Old 1972 - Rare Malts