Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s vs Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s
Glen Ord
★ 5.00
£120
Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish
Bunnahabhain
★ 5.00
£83
| Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s | Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Glen Ord | Bunnahabhain |
| Region | — | Islay |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 40% | 54.3% |
| Age | 12 yr | 14 yr |
| Price | £120 | £82.95 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s
Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish
Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s
Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish
Quick verdict
Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish is better value at £83 vs £120.
For beginners: Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
Cons
- −More expensive (£120 vs £82.95)
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Better value for money
- +More affordable (£82.95 vs £120)
- +Longer maturation (14 vs 12 years)
Cons
- −High ABV (54.3%) — may need water
Who should buy Glen?
Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Who should buy Bunnahabhain?
Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Tasting notes
Only Glen Ord 12 Year Old - 1990s
Only Bunnahabhain 14 Year Old 2003 - Pedro Ximénez Cask Finish