Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s vs Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015)
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s
Glenfarclas
★ 4.00
£599
Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015)
Pulteney
★ 5.00
£399
| Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s | Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015) | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Glenfarclas | Pulteney |
| Region | Speyside | Highland |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 43% | 46% |
| Age | 30 yr | 26 yr |
| Price | £599 | £399 |
| Rating | 4.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s
Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015)
Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s
Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015)
Quick verdict
Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015) is rated higher (5.00 vs 4.00).
Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015) is better value at £399 vs £599.
For beginners: Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 26 years)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −More expensive (£599 vs £399)
- −Lower community rating (4.0 vs 5.0)
- −Lacks smoke character compared to the alternative
Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015)
Pros
- +Balanced smoky character without being overwhelming
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£399 vs £599)
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Who should buy Glenfarclas?
Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Speyside character.
Who should buy Old?
Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015) suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Tasting notes
Only Glenfarclas 30 Year Old - 2010s
Only Old Pulteney 1989 Vintage (bottled 2015)