Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto vs Jura 30 Year Old
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto
Glenmorangie
£965
Jura 30 Year Old
Jura
★ 5.00
£699
| Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto | Jura 30 Year Old | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Glenmorangie | Jura |
| Region | Highland | Island |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 46% | 44% |
| Age | 23 yr | 30 yr |
| Price | £964.5 | £699 |
| Rating | — | 5.00/5 |
Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto
Jura 30 Year Old
Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto
Jura 30 Year Old
Quick verdict
Jura 30 Year Old is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Jura 30 Year Old is better value at £699 vs £965.
For beginners: Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto
Pros
- +Distinctive flavour profile appreciated by enthusiasts
Cons
- −More expensive (£964.5 vs £699)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Jura 30 Year Old
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£699 vs £964.5)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 23 years)
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Who should buy Glenmorangie?
Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 30 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Island character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Glenmorangie 23 Year Old - Dr Bill Lumsden x Azuma Makoto
Only Jura 30 Year Old