Yamazaki 1984 vs Glen Grant 36 Year Old 1975 - Old and Rare (Douglas Laing)

Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.

Yamazaki 1984Glen Grant 36 Year Old 1975 - Old and Rare (Douglas Laing)
DistilleryYamazakiGlen Grant
RegionSpeyside
CountryJapanScotland
TypeSingle MaltSingle Malt
ABV48%54%
AgeNAS36 yr
Price£899.95£699.95
Rating5.00/55.00/5

Yamazaki 1984

Smoke0/100
Sweetness53/100
Beginner55/100
Value6/100

Glen Grant 36 Year Old 1975 - Old and Rare (Douglas Laing)

Smoke0/100
Sweetness47/100
Beginner45/100
Value7/100

Yamazaki 1984

SmokySweetFruitySpicyWoodyFloral

Glen Grant 36 Year Old 1975 - Old and Rare (Douglas Laing)

SmokySweetFruitySpicyWoodyFloral

Quick verdict

Glen Grant 36 Year Old 1975 - Old and Rare (Douglas Laing) is better value at £700 vs £900.

For beginners: Yamazaki 1984 is more approachable (55/100 beginner score).

Yamazaki 1984

Pros

  • +More widely reviewed by the community

Cons

  • More expensive (£899.95 vs £699.95)

Glen Grant 36 Year Old 1975 - Old and Rare (Douglas Laing)

Pros

  • +Better value for money
  • +More affordable (£699.95 vs £899.95)
  • +Vibrant, fresh fruit character

Cons

  • High ABV (54%) — may need water

Who should buy Yamazaki?

Yamazaki 1984 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.

Who should buy Glen?

Glen Grant 36 Year Old 1975 - Old and Rare (Douglas Laing) is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.

Tasting notes

Both taste of

Old WoodNuttySherried

Only Yamazaki 1984

VanillaToasted

Only Glen Grant 36 Year Old 1975 - Old and Rare (Douglas Laing)

Dried FruitTobacco

Explore more