Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor) vs Yamazaki 1984
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor)
Strathisla
£999
Yamazaki 1984
Yamazaki
★ 5.00
£900
| Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor) | Yamazaki 1984 | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Strathisla | Yamazaki |
| Region | Speyside | — |
| Country | Scotland | Japan |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 47.9% | 48% |
| Age | 41 yr | NAS |
| Price | £999 | £899.95 |
| Rating | — | 5.00/5 |
Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor)
Yamazaki 1984
Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor)
Yamazaki 1984
Quick verdict
Yamazaki 1984 is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Yamazaki 1984 is better value at £900 vs £999.
For beginners: Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor) is more approachable (55/100 beginner score).
Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor)
Pros
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −More expensive (£999 vs £899.95)
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Yamazaki 1984
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
- +More affordable (£899.95 vs £999)
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Who should buy Strathisla?
Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor) suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Speyside character.
Who should buy Yamazaki?
Yamazaki 1984 suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Single Malt character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Strathisla 41 Year Old 1967 - Rare Auld (Duncan Taylor)
Only Yamazaki 1984