Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing) vs Longmorn 15 Year Old
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing)
Loch Lomond
★ 5.00
£111
Longmorn 15 Year Old
Longmorn
★ 5.00
£150
| Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing) | Longmorn 15 Year Old | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Loch Lomond | Longmorn |
| Region | Highland | Speyside |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Grain | Single Malt |
| ABV | 51.7% | 45% |
| Age | 24 yr | 15 yr |
| Price | £110.74 | £150 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing)
Longmorn 15 Year Old
Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing)
Longmorn 15 Year Old
Quick verdict
Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing) is better value at £111 vs £150.
For beginners: Longmorn 15 Year Old is more approachable (60/100 beginner score).
Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing)
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +More affordable (£110.74 vs £150)
- +Longer maturation (24 vs 15 years)
- +Rich oak and wood spice complexity
Cons
- −High ABV (51.7%) — may need water
Longmorn 15 Year Old
Pros
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −More expensive (£150 vs £110.74)
Who should buy Loch?
Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing) is for enthusiasts who appreciate cask-strength intensity. Best enjoyed with a few drops of water to open up the flavours. Not ideal for casual drinking or beginners.
Who should buy Longmorn?
Longmorn 15 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Speyside character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Loch Lomond 24 Year Old 1995 (cask 14015) - Old Particular (Douglas Laing)
Only Longmorn 15 Year Old