Tullibardine 25 Year Old vs Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Tullibardine
★ 5.00
£155
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Glen Mhor
★ 5.00
£124
| Tullibardine 25 Year Old | Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing) | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Tullibardine | Glen Mhor |
| Region | Highland | Highland |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 43% | 50% |
| Age | 25 yr | 30 yr |
| Price | £155 | £123.6 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | 5.00/5 |
Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Quick verdict
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing) is better value at £124 vs £155.
For beginners: Tullibardine 25 Year Old is more approachable (70/100 beginner score).
Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Pros
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +More widely reviewed by the community
Cons
- −More expensive (£155 vs £123.6)
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)
Pros
- +Better value for money
- +More affordable (£123.6 vs £155)
- +Longer maturation (30 vs 25 years)
- +Vibrant, fresh fruit character
Cons
- −Niche style — may not suit all palates
Who should buy Tullibardine?
Tullibardine 25 Year Old suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Who should buy Glen?
Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing) suits whisky enthusiasts looking for a well-rounded, complex dram. It rewards those with some experience and an appreciation for Highland character.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Tullibardine 25 Year Old
Only Glen Mhor 30 Year Old 1982 - Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing)