Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) vs Jura 7 Year Old 2012 (Master of Malt)
Side-by-side comparison — price, ABV, scores, tasting notes, pros & cons.
| Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) | Jura 7 Year Old 2012 (Master of Malt) | |
|---|---|---|
| Distillery | Balblair | Jura |
| Region | Highland | Island |
| Country | Scotland | Scotland |
| Type | Single Malt | Single Malt |
| ABV | 46% | 51% |
| Age | 17 yr | 7 yr |
| Price | £68.12 | £49.95 |
| Rating | 5.00/5 | — |
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Jura 7 Year Old 2012 (Master of Malt)
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Jura 7 Year Old 2012 (Master of Malt)
Quick verdict
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) is rated higher (5.00 vs 0.00).
Jura 7 Year Old 2012 (Master of Malt) is better value at £50 vs £68.
For beginners: Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) is more approachable (80/100 beginner score).
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Pros
- +Approachable and beginner-friendly sweetness
- +Great entry point for new whisky drinkers
- +Better value for money
- +Higher community rating (5.0/5)
Cons
- −More expensive (£68.12 vs £49.95)
Jura 7 Year Old 2012 (Master of Malt)
Pros
- +Approachable and beginner-friendly sweetness
- +More affordable (£49.95 vs £68.12)
Cons
- −High ABV (51%) — may need water
- −Lower community rating (0.0 vs 5.0)
Who should buy Balblair?
Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017) is an ideal first whisky — sweet, approachable, and widely available. It's a great gift and a safe choice for anyone new to whisky or who prefers lighter, friendlier drams.
Who should buy Jura?
Jura 7 Year Old 2012 (Master of Malt) suits those who enjoy sweet, honeyed, or fruity whiskies. It's accessible for beginners and crowd-pleasing enough for gifts. Fans of approachable Speyside or Irish whiskey will love it.
Tasting notes
Both taste of
Only Balblair 2000 (bottled 2017)
Only Jura 7 Year Old 2012 (Master of Malt)